IMF Working Papers

How Do Remittances Affect the Real Exchange Rate? An Empirical Investigation

By Alina Carare, Juan P Celis, Metodij Hadzi-Vaskov, Yasumasa Morito

June 20, 2025

Download PDF More Formats on IMF eLibrary Order a Print Copy

Preview Citation

Format: Chicago

Alina Carare, Juan P Celis, Metodij Hadzi-Vaskov, and Yasumasa Morito. "How Do Remittances Affect the Real Exchange Rate? An Empirical Investigation", IMF Working Papers 2025, 122 (2025), accessed June 23, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229013338.001

Export Citation

  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager
  • BibTex
  • Zotero
  • EndNote

Disclaimer: IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

Summary

Growing remittance flows to emerging and developing economies may lead to real exchange rate appreciation and weaken their competitiveness. While the empirical literature finds mixed results about the relevance of this relationship, it does not delve into understanding the interplay of two crucial elements for policymakers—the exchange rate regime and the structure of the economy. Filling this gap in the literature, our paper examines how exchange rate regimes and the structure of the economy affect the impact of remittance flows on the real effective exchange rate (REER). Using data from a large sample of economies over 2008-21, we arrive at three key findings. First, REER overvaluation correlates positively with remittance flows under flexible exchange rate regimes. Once controlling for potential endogeneity in a dynamic panel and other variables determining exchange rate behavior, we find that countries with fixed exchange rate regimes also experience appreciation, albeit smaller and slower relative to countries under flexible regimes. Second, we find relatively larger REER appreciation effects for countries that have import-to-GDP ratios lower than the world median, and countries with remittances-to-GDP ratios higher than the world median. Third, for countries that receive relatively high remittances and import relatively less, the REER appreciates after a remittance shock, regardless of the exchange rate regime. The results are robust to alternative classifications, data sources, specifications and sample size.

Subject: Balance of payments, Conventional peg, Exchange rate arrangements, Exchange rate flexibility, Exchange rates, Foreign exchange, Real effective exchange rates, Real exchange rates, Remittances

Keywords: Conventional peg, Dutch disease, Exchange rate arrangements, Exchange rate flexibility, Exchange rates, Nominal effective exchange rate, Real effective exchange rates, Real exchange rates, Real Exchange Rates, Remittance, Remittances

Publication Details